
Welcome to The Next: A basketball newsroom brought to you by The IX. 24/7/365 womenโs basketball coverage, written, edited, and photographed by our young, diverse staff, dedicated to breaking news, analysis, historical deep dives, and projections about the game we love.
Subscribe to make sure this vital work, creating a pipeline of young, diverse media professionals to write, edit and photograph the great game, continues, and grows. Paid subscriptions include some exclusive content, but the reason for subscriptions is a simple one: making sure our writers and editors creating 24/7/365 womenโs basketball coverage get paid to do it.

The NCAA released the first womenโs NCAA Evaluation Tool (NET) rankings on Monday, officially marking the shift away from RPI-based sorting by implementing the tool the menโs game had used since the 2018-19 season.
Stanford maintained its No. 1 ranking that it has held in the AP Poll since Dec. 7, but below them in the NETโs top 10 are a slightly different cast of characters than the media-voted poll. UConn comes in at No. 2, followed by Baylor, Oregon, South Carolina, Ohio State, NC State, Kentucky, Louisville and Maryland. All 337 Division I teams competing this season are ranked.
โWe felt after much analysis that the womenโs basketball NET, which will be determined by who you played, where you played, how efficiently you played and the result of the game, is a more accurate tool and should be used by the committee going forward,โ said Nina King, NCAA womenโs basketball committee chair and Duke senior athletic director, after the switch was announced in May.
Unlike its predecessor, NET places its weight on specifics including adjusted net efficiency and team value index, figures that work in tandem in order to determine a teamโs overall performance in relation to other teams. It also considers factors such as game location, wherein a team will be more highly rated if it beats the same team on the road or at a neutral site versus at home.
The womenโs NET algorithm is slightly different than that of the menโs because each side of NCAA basketball comes with different historical precedents, not to mention basic data differs between the two. That is, it would be disingenuous to simply copy the menโs formatting for use on the womenโs side.
Already worried about some of the stark differences between the NET rankings, the AP Poll and the often very subjective intricacies that come with handing out at-large NCAA Tournament bids? Donโt be โ the NET is still just one of the many tools used to determine postseason seeding.
โWhat we found during our comparison analysis was that the NET does a more precise job measuring opponent quality given performance than RPI has been able to provide,โ King said. โDoing well on the court and beating good teams continues to be imperative.โ
The NCAA announced last month its preliminary plan to host the 2021 national tournament at a single site, removing the prospect of early home-court advantage for the top teams.
